EAAC, REOM: SIR ROBERT PRESS MAYOR COQUIDE Echarcon
Story of a predictable disaster
or
example not to follow
R. Coquidé, 26 November 2010-11-26
To explain my vote "against" presentation of " REOM i "I said, in public at the meeting of the Community Council of the EAAC 19 October 2010:
" With the REOM such that it is presented, we crash right into the wall, all lights on. "
I should add, moreover, that the President accelerates honking at anyone who will listen: "I'll be the FIRST to this institute in the Department REOM! .
It is true that I made a mistake Prediction: I think the shock would occur in May-June 2011 ... the time for people to understand the magnitude of this absurdity. So I erred on the side of moderation ... !
President shouted (or rather screamed!) Wednesday, November 24 at the public meeting Mennecy, articulating clearly into a microphone: " The REOM is delayed by one year to 1 st January 2012! . Remember he has already told us (On a more measured tone!) in June 2009: "The REOM is postponed until 1 January 2011 st " ... because it was at that time, the 1 st January 2010 .
The same causes produce the same effects, (and the same result in the same stupidities disaster!) , it is now appropriate to take stock of what it should be called "a fiasco predictable and expected " and make the list of actions that led ... and ... he will carefully avoid in the future.
I) Reviews methodological
A) FMB (Global Staffing Operations )
On 'Law Chevenement " (July 12, 1999) , the Intercommunity's primary objective is to optimize services to residents in quality and cost .
For this
- FMB fell sharply for the municipalities, and was amplified for communities.
- Each jurisdiction transferred by the local community, raises FMB thereof (via the automatic increase of the CIF - Cost / Tax Integration) .
- The DGF is designed to "help" communities to better manage for the people skills transferred.
By refusing to use a substantial portion of the DGF to manage OM the EAAC , its chairman and bagman commit misuse of the purpose of the DGF .
B) Institution of REOM the "i"
There was the possibility use during the discussions, the technical, regulatory, legal members of associations of environmental protection in workshops and studies with elected . Some of these members have participated for 3 years in the drafting of PREDMA (bible of waste disposal in the Ile de France).
personally urged President to deny those powers vested . He knows everything, probably!
C) We will be the "PREM" to establish the REOM "i"
These are the words of President! In fact, I think there is still no other communities that have established in the Ile de France ... or at least in the department of Essonne.
questions: Why? Other communities are they at this point, unaware of its benefits? Or are there other reasons? Difficulties implementation? Was it not wise to refine the studies and reflections ... ... prevent precipitation of multiply public consultations ... not to bludgeon the "truths" from above (orchestrating the "com" !) , but to reflect the diversity of issues and problems brought about?
Yes ... but he almost won: he went very close to being the "PREM" !
D) Will we one day the total cost of this mess: hiring a person in order to establish the official fee for special professionals (which was never day) , research department, chipping bins, loan of 200 000 € improvised disaster ....
II) CRITICAL Practical details
A) REOM "i" (as incentive) or REOM "d" (as deterrent)?
with 60% fixed and 40% of variable incentive it has nothing!
The right thing to sort is not paying enough .
B) Size of bins
By refusing bins contain less than 120 liters and condemnation of the individuals is:
- to present high price (!?!?!) their tank almost empty.
- to wait many weeks ... ... it is full before the present (!?!?!).
- to use bags of OM ... for the greatest joy of stray animals (!?!?!).
It is true that it is common to clean the sidewalks ... not the EAAC !
C) bags of green waste to 1.5 € (15 € for 10 bags! € 22.5 to 15 bags!) ... deserve the adjective "deterrent."
D) The refusal to collect the firewood! Without comment as this obvious absurdity .
E) "Bulky appointment" at 10 € unit: risk dumps !
F) The Halls selling paper bags of green waste for the benefit of the EAAC
- the dirty work for municipalities, which must use their resources, their staff ... and wipe the recriminations of the inhabitants.
- the recipe for the EAAC.
- the Commons before probably create (and pay!) a board of revenue collection.
G) dumps generated by this REOM "i" cleared by the Commons.
They will make available staff, a history and accounting ... the EAAC reimbursing municipalities (!?!?!) ... based on a total global fixed ... following a breakdown ... not explained.
H) Encouraging people to increase their trips to the recycling center.
is "any benefit" to the EAAC !
Question: in terms of CO2, is it better a truck carrying waste or a file ... ... ... uninterrupted vehicles converging on a rubbish?
I) lights green waste (or other colors ...) in gardens may restart at a time ... like ... that finally, we all thought over.
III) Notes
A year ago, to approve the principle of the REOM he was (!?!?!) promised in June 2009 by P. Imbert in 2010 to review the ratio of 40% variable, 60% fixed. " Promise Not required : this has never been reviewed during the past year, "he " there is always opposed!
Residents grumble louder by reading the "OM prose" of President (with his picture!) as they make their accounts. "It " probably believed that " com" would do without it!
Obviously it is the Mayors on the front row and wipe the critics for several weeks.
But Patrick Imbert, President, was pleased: " THE PREM IS believed to be ! "Essonne.
This REOM "i" will have almost made at least one happy! It's not even the case!
IV) Conclusion
It's a list, probably incomplete, of nonsense not to renew.
This is not the principle of the REOM which is objectionable in itself, but its implementation requires great skill and the exclusion of any and all amateur improvisation.
For the future, any future attempt at a REOM institution should be a model " pedagogy" and " consultation "not to be confused with" com "or" pub .
R. Coquidé
Mayor Echarcon